Saturday, March 22, 2025

Supreme Court’s strong comment on Vibhav in Swati assault case, said- he is not ashamed, is CM residence meant for keeping goons?

In the Swati Maliwal assault case, the Supreme Court has made a strong comment about Vibhav Kumar. The court said whether the CM residence is meant for keeping goons. The court said that we grant bail even to murderers. But he did not feel ashamed of doing this to the woman.

The Supreme Court has made a strong comment on CM Arvind Kejriwal’s former secretary Vibhav Kumar in the Swati Maliwal assault case. The court said that he was not ashamed. She is a woman. We also give bail to contract killers, murderers. But how was morality put at stake in this case. Actually, the bail plea of ​​​​Vibhav Kumar, accused in the Swati Maliwal assault case, was heard in the Supreme Court today. During this, the court made a big comment on the case. The Supreme Court said, “Were you not ashamed of misbehaving with a woman. The court asked why would anyone testify against Vibhav Kumar? Is the residence meant to keep goons? When Vibhav Kumar was not in the post of private secretary, then what was he doing in the CM residence? Why was he there?

Hearing in court on Swati Maliwal case

Let us tell you that while hearing the bail plea of ​​Bibhav Kumar, the Supreme Court has also issued a notice to Delhi Police. Let us tell you that the next hearing in this case will be on August 7. In today’s hearing, lawyer Abhishek Manu Singhvi, pleading on behalf of Bibhav Kumar, said that the FIR was registered after 3 days. Swati Maliwal went to the police station but returned without registering an FIR. Singhvi further said that on the first day she went to the police, but did not make any complaint. But then after several days the complaint was lodged.

Is the CM residence to keep goons?

After this, Justice Suryakant asked whether Swati Maliwal called 112? If yes, then it proves your claim that she fabricated the story to be false. Singhvi admitted that Swati Maliwal had gone to the CM residence. Justice Suryakant asked whether the CM’s government house is a private residence? Are such rules needed for this? We are surprised, this is not about minor or major injuries. The High Court has heard everything properly. During this, the Supreme Court remarked whether the CM’s residence is meant for keeping goons?

Hot this week

Grok AI Responds to Indian Government’s Investigation

Elon Musk's AI chatbot, Grok, is in the spotlight...

Adani Group Enters Wire & Cable Business, Stocks of Polycab & KEI Fall

The wire and cable industry is set for a...

₹150 Crore to be Sent to 70,000 Beneficiaries in Haryana – CM Nayab Singh Saini

Haryana Chief Minister Nayab Singh Saini presented the state...

MS Dhoni Reveals the Most Dangerous Bowler in World Cricket

MS Dhoni, one of the greatest finishers in cricket...

Calcutta High Court Orders IG to Submit Report on Student Leader’s Allegations

On March 11, 2025, the Calcutta High Court directed...

Topics

Grok AI Responds to Indian Government’s Investigation

Elon Musk's AI chatbot, Grok, is in the spotlight...

₹150 Crore to be Sent to 70,000 Beneficiaries in Haryana – CM Nayab Singh Saini

Haryana Chief Minister Nayab Singh Saini presented the state...

MS Dhoni Reveals the Most Dangerous Bowler in World Cricket

MS Dhoni, one of the greatest finishers in cricket...

Minister Raghuraj Singh’s Controversial Statement on Holi and Hijab

Uttar Pradesh minister Raghuraj Singh has made a controversial...

Khalistan Supporters Block S. Jaishankar’s Car in London, India Condemns Incident

Indian External Affairs Minister (EAM) S. Jaishankar faced protests...

Related Articles

Popular Categories