Supreme Court's strong comment on Vibhav in Swati assault case, said- he is not ashamed, is CM residence meant for keeping goons? - Times of Kashi

Supreme Court’s strong comment on Vibhav in Swati assault case, said- he is not ashamed, is CM residence meant for keeping goons?

Nikhil Jain
By Nikhil Jain Add a Comment

In the Swati Maliwal assault case, the Supreme Court has made a strong comment about Vibhav Kumar. The court said whether the CM residence is meant for keeping goons. The court said that we grant bail even to murderers. But he did not feel ashamed of doing this to the woman.

The Supreme Court has made a strong comment on CM Arvind Kejriwal’s former secretary Vibhav Kumar in the Swati Maliwal assault case. The court said that he was not ashamed. She is a woman. We also give bail to contract killers, murderers. But how was morality put at stake in this case. Actually, the bail plea of ​​​​Vibhav Kumar, accused in the Swati Maliwal assault case, was heard in the Supreme Court today. During this, the court made a big comment on the case. The Supreme Court said, “Were you not ashamed of misbehaving with a woman. The court asked why would anyone testify against Vibhav Kumar? Is the residence meant to keep goons? When Vibhav Kumar was not in the post of private secretary, then what was he doing in the CM residence? Why was he there?

Hearing in court on Swati Maliwal case

Let us tell you that while hearing the bail plea of ​​Bibhav Kumar, the Supreme Court has also issued a notice to Delhi Police. Let us tell you that the next hearing in this case will be on August 7. In today’s hearing, lawyer Abhishek Manu Singhvi, pleading on behalf of Bibhav Kumar, said that the FIR was registered after 3 days. Swati Maliwal went to the police station but returned without registering an FIR. Singhvi further said that on the first day she went to the police, but did not make any complaint. But then after several days the complaint was lodged.

Is the CM residence to keep goons?

After this, Justice Suryakant asked whether Swati Maliwal called 112? If yes, then it proves your claim that she fabricated the story to be false. Singhvi admitted that Swati Maliwal had gone to the CM residence. Justice Suryakant asked whether the CM’s government house is a private residence? Are such rules needed for this? We are surprised, this is not about minor or major injuries. The High Court has heard everything properly. During this, the Supreme Court remarked whether the CM’s residence is meant for keeping goons?

Share This Article
Follow:
Nikhil Jain, an Indian journalist and social activist from Ahmedabad, is known as the founder of timesofkashi.in. This website serves as a platform for news and information, particularly focusing on issues relevant to the Kashi region and beyond. Nikhil Jain's journalism and activism aim to highlight local stories and contribute to public discourse on various social and political issues.
Leave a comment